A LETTER TO LOWNIE: Why Did You Hide Evidence About The Prince Andrew Scandal?
When writing his book, Entitled: The Fall of the House of York, Andrew Lownie contacted me and requested an interview regarding my five-year investigation into Giuffre. But then he misled his readers.
Lownie was sent, and subsequently read, a 223-page report containing irrefutable evidence that Virginia Giuffre was a serial false accuser, child-recruiter, and that she is proven to have lied about having sex with Prince Andrew.
However, despite confirming to me that the evidence was ‘impressive’ and ‘damning’ against Giuffre, he chose to hide this evidence from readers of his book, instead cultivating a false narrative to mislead readers and encourage them to join him on his bizarre crusade against Prince Andrew and the reputation of the monarchy.
Furthermore, in a recent debate on Piers Morgan Uncensored, Lownie lied to watchers when panelist, publisher, and PR expert Brian Basham mentioned the report, contradicting his acknowledgement that evidence against Giuffre was ‘damning’, by appearing flustered and claiming the opposite.
Below is my full report that Lownie acknowledged was ‘damning’ for Virginia Giuffre’.
The following is a letter I sent to Lownie. I’ll be including any response in my upcoming book, NAKED LIES: The Epstein Scandal That Rocked The Royals.
Dear Mr. Lownie,
I’d like to offer you the chance to provide a comment regarding a claim you made in your recent interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored.
During this interview, you were told by Brian Basham that he had sent you evidence proving that Prince Andrew’s accuser, Virginia Giuffre, was a serial liar. Your response to him was that you had read what he had sent you, but that ‘none of it added up’.
As you are aware, and as our emails prove, the evidence you were shown was a detailed report that I first compiled in 2020.
You contacted me asking to interview me, after which I too sent you the detailed report.
Your reply to me was that the report was ‘impressive and damning’.
I’m soon to have a book released, covering my 5-year investigation into the scandal, and my interviews with most of the key witnesses.
The title is, ‘NAKED LIES: The Epstein Scandal That Rocked The Royals’.
Please could you provide answers to the following questions:
1.The report you received contains evidence, including from Virginia’s first memoir, The Billionaire’s Playboy Club, that she has a history of making false accusations. Do you dispute this?
2. In a recent video post on your Substack, you falsely inform your audience that Virginia’s original memoir was written by a ghostwriter, and thus any mistakes or inconsistencies can be attributed to said ghostwriter. However, Virginia confirmed under oath that this memoir (unlike her latest) was not written by a ghostwriter and was instead written solely by Virginia Giuffre. Further evidence confirms this, including emails between Virginia and Sharon Churcher, in which Virginia clearly rejects a ghostwriter (her reasoning being that she did not want to part with any percentage of potential book royalties. Do you dispute this evidence, or do you accept that you failed to conduct a thorough research into the matter and thus, intentionally or not, misled your audience?
3. In the report that you were sent, and which you confirmed during your Piers Morgan interview and correspondence to me that you had read, a long list of points are made, supported by evidence. These are just some of them:
Virginia falsely claimed in a legal court filing that she had been trafficked to foreign presidents, before admitting during her 2016 deposition that she had never met any.
Virginia wrote in her first memoir that she had been trafficked to Prince Andrew in New Mexico, going into lurid detail about going horseback riding with him and having sex with him during a long private weekend together on Epstein’s ‘Zorro ranch’. Later, in 2016, she admitted that this event did not take place, and thus she had lied.
Virginia initially confirmed to journalist Sharon Churcher that she had not engaged in any sexual activity with Prince Andrew.
Virginia falsely accused Professor Alan Dershowitz of rape, and her lawyer, David Boies, had confirmed to Dershowitz that she was ‘wrong, simply wrong’, because Dershowitz could prove that he had never met her.
Before ever meeting Epstein, Virginia had falsely accused two innocent teenagers of raping her, before her case was dropped due to, as the leading prosecutor stated, ‘her lack of credibility’.
Virginia falsely accused another Prince, a string of celebrities, a Prime Minister, and numerous other individuals.
Virginia admitted that she ‘may have been mistaken’ in accusing Alan Dershowitz (despite, in her recent memoir, stating that it is impossible for a victim of abuse to forget the face of their abuser).
Virginia claimed that she had sex with Prince Andrew in Kinnerton street, yet gave a description of the bathroom in which she claimed the encounter took place - and got every detail of that bathroom wrong, including falsely claiming that it contained a Victorian freestanding bathtub.
4. In your book, Entitled, why did you not include any of the evidence I mention in point three, despite now acknowledging that you were aware of it and had declared it to be ‘impressive and damning’? Did you intentionally omit this evidence to mislead your readers?
5. What is your response to those who allege that you invent some of your ‘anonymous sources’ and have sold numerous ‘fake stories’ regarding Prince Andrew and other members of the Royal Family to the press?
6. When writing your book, what research did you conduct into Giuffre’s allegations; did you do conduct that research impartially or influenced by a desire for confirmation bias, and why did you fail to present an accurate account of Virginia Giuffre in Entitled?
7. Virginia Giuffre has been proven to have groomed and recruited numerous school children whilst she was a legal adult, and confirmed in her memoir that she was not instructed to do so. It has been confirmed that she also coerced them into lying about their ages, so that she could ‘trick’ Epstein into believing the girls were of legal age, and so she could financially profit. Why do you omit this damning aspect from your book?
8. What is your response to the mother of one of Giuffre’s child victims, who claims that writers like yourself have whitewashed Virginia’s recruiting of children and have glorified and misrepresented a woman who willingly destroyed the life of her daughter and the lives of other innocent young girls?
I hope to hear back from you shortly.
Regards,
Jay Beecher
Jay do you have any major media appearances lined up? Time to go on the offensive!