Andrew's Titles Should Be Restored - Read the Evidence Proving His Accuser Lied
The Duke's downfall has been splashed across front pages across the world. But the truth behind the sex allegations against him isn't what you'd expect.
‘It’s monumental,” a grinning Sky Roberts Jr told the press as, earlier this week, the news broke that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor had been arrested. “We’re astronomically proud of my sister. This is where the house of cards starts falling.”
“Virginia has been vindicated!’ many began to tweet, wrongly believing that a man being brought in for questioning over the alleged sharing of sensitive emails was somehow akin to being cast into a cell for having sex with a minor.
They were all, of course, referring to Prince Andrew’s famous, or perhaps now rather ‘infamous’ accuser, the late Virginia Giuffre.
As the ghoulish masses revelled in another man’s misery, scoffing at the front page-splattered image of a bewildered Andrew slumping into his seat during his lonely drive home from the police station, no-one seemed to give a fig for the age-old legal right to the presumption of innocence. And they cared even less for one inconvenient, indisputable fact:
The downfall of the Duke, and the ongoing witch hunt, is based upon the debunked lies of a demonstrable false accuser.
Whilst Andrew’s arrest pertaining to him allegedly sharing sensitive government material is legally sound, the stripping of his titles over lurid sex stories, without evidence, without a trial, is beyond the pale.
Those titles should be restored, and here are ten reasons why:
Before she had even met Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Giuffre, at that time Virginia Roberts, falsely accused two teenage boys of raping her. Her case was eventually dropped upon it being discovered that the three had engaged in a consensual threesome, with prosecutors issuing a statement that Giuffre lacked credibility.
In another incident, again before she met Epstein, Giuffre claimed she’d been raped by another teenager - only for police to discover that she was in fact trying to rewrite history. She later admitted that she had willingly given oral sex to the accused teenager on someone’s front lawn.
When Giuffre’s scandalous Prince Andrew story first broke in 2011, she clearly stated that she had had no sexual contact with him. Her story changed, however, after being paid over $140,000 by the Mail on Sunday.
Sharon Churcher, the journalist who wrote that first article, later admitted that Giuffre was a ‘liar’, a former prostitute, and accused her of blackmailing Professor Alan Dershowitz.
Giuffre went on to falsely claim she'd been trafficked to Prince Andrew in New Mexico, writing several lurid pages in her unpublished memoir, the Billionaire’s Playboy Club, detailing how she and the prince had spent a long weekend at Epstein’s Zorro ranch, horse riding together, sipping champagne, and having sex in a candlelit bathtub. Then, during a deposition in 2016, under oath, Giuffre admitted that no such event took place. She had never once been to New Mexico with Prince Andrew. She had lied.
Giuffre then claimed (and was generously paid by the press to do so) that she and Andrew took part in a wild orgy on Epstein’s island, whereby she, the Duke, and Epstein, rithed around in Bacchanalian ecstasy with ten foreign nymphs. Later, however, it was revealed that she had made this up, with her first rendition of the story found to have accused Jean-Luc Brunel to have been present, before she later substituted him in her tall tale for Andrew.
Giuffre falsely claimed in a lawsuit that she had been trafficked to foreign presidents. But in 2016 she admitted that she hadn’t ever met a foreign president in her life.
After being offered a large sum of money to write a fiction-riddled memoir, she then accused President Donald Trump’s former lawyer, the renowned Professor Alan Dershowitz, alleging she’d had sex with him multiple times. Almost a decade later, after Dershowitz proved beyond any doubt that he never so much as met her, and after her own lawyer, David Boies, was secretly recorded admitting that her claim couldn’t possibly be true, Giuffre finally admitted that her allegation was false, begrudgingly issuing a public statement that she ‘may have been mistaken’.
Giuffre also accused Paris Hilton’s father, Jacques Cousteau’ss granddaughter, multiple senators, famous scientists, and a string of celebrities. But then, after they proved that they’d never met her, she stopped mentioning their names.
Giuffre’s own lawyer, Bradley Edwards, eventually acknowledged on national television that she had not been trafficked to anyone other than Jeffrey Epstein.
For over five years now, I’ve been investigating the Epstein scandal, predominantly focusing on Virginia Giuffre. I could go on and on listing the many contradictions and full-blown fabrications in her allegations against multiple innocent individuals. I could tell you, with full evidence, of how she, whilst a legal adult, groomed and recruited underage children, took them to Epstein, lied that they were over 18, and helped to sexually assault them in exchange for large sums of cash.
But it would be better if you listened to the evidence yourself. Below is a viral episode of my podcast, Everything Epstein, in which I include some of my shocking interviews with key witnesses, including Professor Alan Dershowitz, Giuffre’s former boyfriends, and the mother of one of Giuffre’s victims. And then I highly recommend that you read my upcoming book, NAKED LIES, in which the truth and evidence surrounding this entire scandal is finally laid bare.
Were it not for the press and media’s absolute disregard for truth when it comes to their fanatical, unethical dissemination of the debunked sex allegations against Prince Andrew and their crusade against him, I truly believe that we would all be hearing reports of an investigation right now, rather than an arrest. I truly believe that the mob would place down their pitchforks. An I sincerely believe that, if the rule of law means anything in this country, many of us would be calling for the restoration of his titles.



Holy shit! VRG was a complete BPD hoe!
I know that you and JRK are not fans of MT who also follows this from the same perspective as you based on the evidence. Putting that to one side is there a way that you can provide this and the other info to some of the same podcasters like Winston Marshall, David Saks from All InUnheard, Michael Sisak from AP whose articles are at least balanced and who covered the FBI report . Not to compete but to clarify.Two voices are better than one even if you are not a fan of the other voice. You speak so well if there is a way to increase your audience…..