I've Investigated The Epstein Scandal For Over Half a Decade - I've Found ZERO Evidence Suggesting Trump is Involved
For over five years, I've travelled the world in an attempt to get to the bottom of what has perhaps become the biggest scandal in living history.
It is a scandal consisting of genuine victims and false witnesses; a scandal that has spawned television series, poured infinite gallons of ink into printing presses, swallowed up famous faces, and morphed into a global witch hunt that, just yesterday, ‘de-princed’ a prince.
I am, of course, referring to the Jeffrey Epstein Affair.
My investigation began out of principle, entirely alone, entirely independent. Ironically, it started with me sitting at my rickety old writing bureau back in 2020, scribbling out a rather generic article covering allegations made against Prince Andrew by a woman named Virginia Giuffre. Half a decade has since passed, and I’m now considered by the press as one of Giuffre’s most vocal critics.
Why? Because when I placed down my pen and decided to fact-check my subject’s claims (having initially no reason to doubt them, yet keen to carry out some form of journalistic due diligence), I was astonished to learn that Virginia was a demonstrable serial liar and, as I would later discover, exactly what she had accused others of being: a sex trafficker of children.
I still remember that moment of realisation, sitting in my room, staring in awe at the evidence I had accumulated from scrolling through tens of thousands of pages - from lawsuit depositions and interview transcripts, to flight logs, emails, witness statements and Virginia’s unpublished memoir.
It was in that memoir (which a judge conveniently blocked Prince Andrew from submitting as evidence in his defence) where I found a treasure trove of inconsistencies and all-out lies.
But the most remarkable thing? The press and media, cowed by the MeToo mob (an initially brilliant and much-needed movement) and incentivised by the advertising revenues on offer for the production of salacious clickbait, refused to report any of it.
The public was not only being intentionally left in the dark by negligent journalists, but was being led into artificial light by a media machine with profits to make and axes to grind.
Facts were, and are, being withheld from them - from YOU.
The fact that Virginia originally claimed she’d never had sex with Prince Andrew;
The fact that she wrote in vivid detail of how she had sex with him on a lust-filled weekend in New Mexico, only to later admit under oath that no such event ever took place; The fact that a judge branded Virginia as lacking credibility after she had falsely accused two teenagers of raping her before she ever met Epstein; The fact that she had lied about Ghislaine Maxwell’s involvement, had admitted to falsely claiming she’d been trafficked to foreign presidents before acknowledging she’d in fact never met any... And the fact that she had stalked the streets and schools of Palm Beach whilst she was over eighteen, a legal adult, and deviously groomed school girls to sell to Jeffrey Epstein.
Yes, you read that correctly - and I was probably just as shocked and confused to learn about this at the time as you are now.
Carolyn Andriano was just one of her many victims. She was only fourteen-years-old at the time when Virginia groomed her, gave her drugs, dressed her up in adult clothes, told her to lie that she was over the legal age of consent, and drove her to Epstein’s home to provide an erotic massage.
She was still a naïve school girl when Virginia led her, like a lamb to the slaughter, up the carpeted stairs into Epstein’s room and made her watch as she undressed and engaged in sexual activity with the disgraced financier. Was Virginia coerced into doing this? No. Jeffrey Epstein had never even heard of Carolyn before Virginia brought her to him, her sole motivation being what Virginia herself described in her first memoir as ‘easy commission’.
Carolyn would, sadly, due to the path Virginia willingly tricked her into taking, later die in a hotel room of a suspected drug overdose (though some believe she may have been murdered).
I have since interviewed Carolyn’s mother, who demanded justice for her daughter and who was heartbroken and baffled as to why Carolyn’s groomer and recruiter had falsely been portrayed as a brave survivor. Why wasn’t Virginia behind bars where she belonged, her mother ranted with frustration. Why were journalists not only protecting her and attacking her critics, but also intentionally pulling the wool over the eyes of the public and publishing lie after lie in a twisted attempt to canonise a criminal?
None of it made sense, and it still doesn’t.
My investigation has led me to interview most of the key witnesses involved in the case, from Virginia’s former ‘inner circle’, including her ex-boyfriends, to Epstein’s brother, the artist Rina Oh (who accuses Virginia of sexual assault and is currently suing her estate), numerous accusers and the accused, and the renowned attorney Professor Alan Dershowitz.
Some of you may recall that Dershowitz was falsely accused by Virginia, sued her for defamation, and possessed evidence to prove that she was lying. You may not have read the outcome, however (buried in the corners of back pages by embarrassed editors) that Virginia’s lies inevitably unravelled and she essentially acknowledged that Dershowitz was innocent.
There is a LOT more I would like to say and release right now, more so-far unpublished evidence and shocking exclusive interviews that will undoubtedly change your perspective on the entire scandal. Yet that must wait until the release of my upcoming book, NAKED LIES: The Epstein Scandal that Rocked the Royals.
But what of Dershowitz’s former client, President Donald Trump?
Much time and energy have been devoted by his critics to plant him into the picture, evidently seeking to exploit the scandal to pressure for the downfall of a president, not with facts, but with confirmation bias and a deep-rooted, toxic type of hate.
I myself have been critical of Trump’s attitudes towards Ukraine as it bravely defends itself against Russia’s ongoing barbaric and unprovoked invasion. But was he, as some suggest, guilty of being involved in Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged crimes?
I can honestly say this, following a decade of digging, of countless travels to interview witnesses, and having examined every piece of evidence available:
I have not found a single shred of evidence to suggest that President Trump was guilty of, or in any way involved in, the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein.
To vent some of his own frustrations over being falsely accused and publicly shamed, despite his innocence, Professor Dershowitz wrote the book, ‘Guilt by Association’. The title is self-explanatory, and the premise can equally be applied to Donald Trump.
Should Trump, who cut ties with Epstein long before the billionaire’s conviction, be automatically smeared as having partaken in his past pal’s crimes, devoid of any evidence, just because some folk don’t like him? Of course not.
To some extent, by not shooting down QAnon or the Epstein client list myth (perhaps because, at the time, it benefited his campaign, with the myth mainly targeting Democrats), it can be said that Trump shot himself in the foot. The president is now not only plagued by his enemies trying to connect dots by inventing dots, but also haunted by a “release the Epstein files!”’- grunting golem that he partly created through his administration’s promise, and subsequent failure, to have them unsealed.
But this torment is synthetic, a Disney World-style Haunted House experience of smoke and mirrors being perpetuated by bad-faith actors and agenda-driven activists parading as journalists.
They do not care much for inconvenient evidence. They couldn’t give a fig about facts. And they certainly don’t give a damn about reporting the truth:
That some of the victims weren’t actually victims.
That Ghislaine Maxwell was used as a scapegoat and did not receive a fair trial.
That Virginia Giuffre was a serial false accuser and trafficker of children.
And that none of Epstein’s accusers - not even Virginia Giuffre herself - accused him of any inappropriate behaviour or criminality.
The only logical explanation for this?
President Trump is innocent.