The Secret Plot Underway as Epstein's 'Assistant' Sarah Kellen Finally Breaks Her Silence, Ian Maxwell Slams 'Fake News' About his Sister, and the Truth Revealed About Nadia Marcinko
The media refuse to tell you about this part of the Epstein scandal.
Epstein’s infamous former assistant/alleged lover has broken her five-year silence.
Another one of Epstein’s former lovers is joining her.
And Ian Maxwell, the brother of Ghislaine Maxwell, has written a letter to The Times, reigniting memories of the fierce feud involving his late father, that came to be remembered as ‘Maxwell vs. Murdoch’.
As most of you will know, I deplore conspiracy theories and am documented as having spent years debunking them.
But this is all being carefully, and most certainly, choreographed.
THE LETTER
Ian Maxwell’s letter to The Times is in response to an article written by Josie Ensor in which she falsely asserts that there were over a thousand victims of Jeffrey Epstein. In reality, Ensor has lazily parroted a myth. In reality, neither the DoJ, the FBI, or any police force has ever made such a claim. On the contrary, the DoJ has publicly stated that all of the evidence proves that Epstein and his associates did not engage in a ‘global sex trafficking operation’ and that there is no ‘Epstein client list’.
You can watch one of my interviews with Ian Maxwell below.
His letter, which hasn’t been made public until now, reads as follows:
Sir,
Josie Ensor’s article, “I’ve interviewed dozens of Epstein victims. There’s one person they still fear”, (news, May 15), strains credulity. It feels less like reporting than outright advocacy, trading conjecture for proof.
The claim that there are “more than a thousand identified survivors of Epstein” suggests a settled list of named, known complainants, when the reality is a far looser estimate of those believed to have been harmed. The Epstein compensation fund paid money to some 135 claimants, only a fraction of whom have identified themselves publicly.
The anonymous “Francesca” is deployed for maximum effect, but anonymity is not evidence. If her adult relationship with Epstein was transactional — unedifying, perhaps sordid, but not evidently unlawful — then the article should not invite readers to leap from discomfort to criminality.
Recently released Epstein Files prove that Ghislaine Maxwell was never reported by Maria Farmer either to the FBI or the NYPD. Her later unsubstantiated allegations of the kind quoted in this article have never been stood up in court. Treating them as settled truth is exactly the sort of selective reporting that corrodes trust.
Ms Ensor goes on to quote Anouska De Georgiou’s allegation that “Ghislaine Maxwell was present for some of my abuse at the hand of Jeffrey Epstein”, without also making clear that the Maxwell trial judge directed the jurors they could not convict on her evidence. De Georgiou had endured no “illegal sexual activity” from Epstein or Maxwell for being over the age of consent in England at the time she claims to have first encountered them. To omit that is the very fact that gives the quotation its legal meaning. This is not balance; it is distortion by omission.
That’s not the story, however, to attract prurient readers and thus boost advertising revenue which is what pleases media owners and coincidentally pays journalists’ salaries.
More broadly, the piece has the familiar weaknesses of sensational copy: heat is preferred to precision; aggregation masquerades as insight. Epstein was clearly predatory and deceptive, but that does not absolve a newspaper from the obligation to distinguish allegation from established fact. The Times should be more exacting than this.
Yours faithfully,
Ian Maxwell
MY TAKE
THE MEDIA TURNING THEIR CHOSEN VILLAINS INTO VICTIMS, AND THE BIGGEST BLACKMAIL PLOT IN HISTORY.
The lawyers need more sensational, insinuatory Epstein-related headlines to pile up the pressure onto their wealthy targets, essentially extorting them to settle. They turn to their associates in the press, who rely on those same lawyers to feed them clickable stories, factual or not (more than often, not), to earn them a crust and to give the declining tabloids they work for a much needed boost in advertising revenue.
Suddenly, our newsfeeds are once again set to be filled with unsubstantiated allegations and fact-devoid horror stories woven from tall tales heavily reliant on guilt by association.
We saw it back at the beginning of this entire scandal; leaked messages proving that attorney David Boies, along with numerous other controversial lawyers representing Epstein’s accusers (some of whom have since been completely discredited), plotting to squeeze huge sums of money from accused wealthy men in exchange for keeping their names out of the spotlight:
We saw it in their false allegations against President Donald Trump, choreographed between those very lawyers, the left-wing media, and Trump-loathing politicians (whom Boies and co admitted to working with, pro bono) in an attempt to achieve their individual objectives: The press to get their stories, disingenuous congressmen like Ro Khanna and the recently de-throned Thomas Massie to smear Trump, and the lawyers to extort more out-of-court settlements (JP Morgan and Deutsch Bank alone paid them hundreds of millions of dollars rather than be dragged onto the public pyre and have their reputations forever burned):
We saw it with Professor Alan Dershowitz, whom Boies threatened with the continuation of being smeared by the media if he didn’t cough up a cool million to make the allegations made against him by Virginia Giuffre go away… despite those allegations being demonstrably false, and despite Boies himself being secretly recorded admitting that his client was ‘wrong, simply wrong’:
And now we are seeing that modus operandi kicking into action all over again.
You may have noticed that, when it comes to the Epstein scandal, the media have been oddly quiet of late. So too have the lawyers. An out-of-place lull in coverage of the scandal that can’t just be reasoned away by the war in Iran taking up page space.
Yet things have been stirring in the background. A plot is underway, carefully orchestrated to keep the lucrative blackmail ring in riches.
You can listen to one of my explosive interviews with Professor Dershowitz below, in which he details some of the alleged blackmail involved in the Epstein scandal:
As part of the next phase of what could perhaps be described as the biggest fraud in history, new multi-million-dollar lawsuits will soon join those that are still ongoing. This time (so two prominent Epstein accusers have told me), the targets will be Harvard University and American Express.
The former will be extorted for simply accepting donations from Epstein. The latter, one of the world’s biggest bank holding companies, will be accused of ‘helping to facilitate Epstein’s crimes’ (for simply allowing him to use their services like anyone else).
And once again, pressure from the press, and the public being misled and whipped-up into a baying mob, are both much-needed factors to force American Express and Harvard to make astronomical out of court settlements.
New sensational headlines are coming, and they will be predominantly focused on Epstein’s ex-assistant, Sarah Kellen, and, I highly suspect, from his former lover and long-time golden girl, Nadia Marcinko.
Indeed, both Nadia’s and Sarah’s names have already been creeping into online click-bait headlines in the past couple of days, though (for now) being largely ignored by the public.
The fact-resistant Times article that left Ian Maxwell feeling peeved arrived during the same week that Sarah Kellen decided to break her silence.
In it, Josie Ensor keeps her source, an alleged Epstein victim, anonymous - yet, in my opinion (after having been involved in the case for many years), gives the game away by noting multiple checkable details, not least of all by revealing that the woman is ‘eastern European’ and was 15 when she first came into Epstein’s orbit.
Nadia Marcinko/Marcinkova was born in Slovakia in 1986. She was 15-years-old and reportedly in a vulnerable position when she was sent to be mentored and funded by Epstein.
She lived in his Palm Beach mansion, travelled constantly on his planes, and eventually trained as a pilot. Epstein reportedly funded parts of her aviation career. Later she reinvented herself online as “Gulfstream Girl” and “Global Girl,” cultivating a glossy aviation-influencer persona with luxury aircraft photos and jet-set branding.
There is no black and white narrative to Nadia and Jeffrey’s relationship. The truth, as much as I’ve been able to establish, will be out next week.
What I’ll also be covering is the uncomfortable, sexualised scrapbook that Nadia presented to Epstein as a gift, allegations made against her by other Epstein accusers, the 67 visits to Epstein she reportedly made while he served his 2008 jail sentence in Florida, and a long statement she wrote in support of Epstein (in which she stated that the media were lying about her).
For now, let’s focus on why both she and Sarah Kellen are choosing now to, at the same time, finally speak out.
Anyone who has been following the Epstein scandal in-depth over the years cannot possibly fail to see that the timing of this sudden revival of media interest, or the pair’s u-turning on on is no mere coincidence.
In the early hours of this morning, MS NOW (formerly known as MSNBC) published an article with the headline: “Set to appear before Congress, an Epstein ‘potential co-conspirator’ says she, too, was a victim”
The article’s author, Lisa Rubin, has previously made false claims about the Epstein scandal, including publicly claiming that a letter written by the family of the late Virginia Giuffre evidenced that ‘survivors’ of Epstein ‘view Trump as Epstein and Maxwell’s co-conspirator’… despite the letter clearly not evidencing this at all.
“In a series of exclusive conversations with MS NOW, Sarah Kellen said she has endured decades of being villainised from her association with Epstein — but she said she is actually a survivor of his abuse,” Rubin’s article continues.
Kellen - who has not publicly commented on the Epstein scandal for over five years - was a former assistant and alleged lover of the late disgraced financier throughout the early 2000s. She supported Epstein after his arrest, yet did claim that Epstein assaulted her once onboard his private jet.
Police records clearly document Kellen having organised sexualised massages for Epstein, but that she asked for new girls coming to his West Palm Beach pad to confirm that they were over eighteen.
Kellen was a key witness in Epstein’s first arrest, after some of the girls admitted to having lied to Kellen and Epstein that they were over the legal age of consent in order to provide erotic massages for financial reward.
You can read the full shocking truth about that first arrest by clicking on my article below:
A non-prosecution agreement, widely dubbed ‘the sweetheart deal’, was eventually signed (you can read, in Epstein’s own words, why the nickname isn’t justified by clicking here).
Epstein pleaded guilty to the solicitation of a minor for prostitution, and prosecutors agreed to give immunity for his unwitting assistants, including Sarah Kellen.
Decades passed, and Kellen retreated into a life of relative reclusiveness. Until this morning - and for good reason.
Politicians, working with Boies and his lawyer associates, began to realise that the public were beginning to see that the Epstein Files were a big nothing burger. Thus the likes of (now former) congressman Thomas Massie resorted to blaming the American government (and, of course, President Trump) of orchestrating a cover-up.
To keep the public pitchforks waving, Massie and Ro Khanna stood up on the House floor and read out the names of four men whom they claimed to be co-conspirators. When that didn’t work, however (after it was swiftly revealed that the four men were in fact completely innocent and had never even met Jeffrey Epstein, they joined forces with their agenda-addled counterparts in calling for the ‘real’ co-conspirators to be forced to testify.
The two women whom they honed in on were Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinko.
Facing mounting pressure from politicians and the press, both, it seems are now coming out of hibernation to ‘clear their names’.
Have they been manipulated by the likes of Boies to do so? Are they now cooperating with the lawyers and the lawyers’ pals in the media? Are they suddenly changing their stories to corroborate a crumbling mainstream narrative and help Boies bag more bucks, in exchange for the media (and subsequently the media-influenced legal system) now presenting them as victims rather than the villains that the same media has been telling us they are for the past decade?
Either way, once again, the truth and millions of dollars are at stake.
Sensational headlines will undoubtedly come pouring in over the coming weeks and months.
American Express and Harvard University will most certainly fold under the pressure and make substantial out of court payments.
Lawyers who are fully aware that some of their clients are not really victims, will be able to buy more summer houses and fancy cars at the expense of the lives of innocent men and women.
Epstein’s former yacht girls, sugar babies and, in some cases, self-confessed ex-escorts, will get paid yet again (though this time from Epstein-related compensation payouts rather than directly from Epstein’s wallet).
The real victims in the scandal, i.e. the school girls groomed and recruited by women such as Virginia Giuffre and Haley Robson, will continue to be ignored:
And in the process, the general public will be pulled further away from the truth behind this entire sordid scandal.
That’s why I urge you to join me and kindly do the following:
Share this article.
Download the eBook version of my book, Naked Lies. Based on my extensive research over the past five (almost six) years and on my interviews with most of the key witnesses in the case, it finally exposes the truth - and the mainstream media have been actively trying to silence it and stop you reading it.
Subscribe to my Substack as a paid subscriber below if you aren’t already. Not only will you get access to read, see and listen to the many exclusive interviews I’ve conducted, including with Epstein’s brother, Epstein’s accusers, and members of the Maxwell family, but you’ll be supporting independent journalism and will kindly help me to continue delivering you the truth that you deserve.
In the meantime, I’ll be rummaging back through my files and producing further reports, starting with ‘The Search for Sarah Kellen’ on Monday, followed by deeper dives into Nadia Marcinko and Anouska de Georgiou. I’ve also got a very long list of explosive articles coming out over the coming days and weeks.
Stay alert,
Stay sceptical,
and stay tuned.
The supposed 15 year old from Eastern Europe cannot have been Nadia Marcinkova who provably met Epstein at age 18 somewhat randomly at Jean Luc Brunel's birthday party on September 17th or 18th of 2003.
I believe "Francesca" could be a fraud.